Rx License-Rx

TAB-2759

Physiologic Sampling Pump Capable of Rapidly Adapting to User Breathing Rate

This CDC developed physiologic sampling pump (PSP) overcomes shortcomings of previous devices by the use of calibrated valves in conjunction with a constant speed pump. This novel approach obviates typical PSP inertia that inherently limits system response, functionality and accuracy. All prior PSP designs have attempted to follow a user's breathing pattern by changing pump speed, thereby altering sampling rate. In that approach, pump inertia will limit system response and function due to the time required to adjust speed. Additionally, variable pump speeds often produce size selective sampling errors at low flow rates. Performance of this PSP is not degraded by pump inertia or low flow size selective sampling errors. This design maintains a consistent pump speed, controlling PSP sampling rate with calibrated valves that redirect air flow almost instantaneously. In situ device testing demonstrated that when this air-flow valve is...

Intelligence Memo

Owner: National Institutes of Health

Core category: Therapeutics

Therapeutic area: Ophthalmology

Indication: Ophthalmology

Modality: Biologic

Focus tags: Ophthalmology, Oncology, Infectious Disease, Cardiometabolic, Inflammation

Technology tags: Biologic, Diagnostic / Biomarker

Mechanism:

Development stage: Preclinical

Patent status: Abandoned; Issued

Availability: Available for license

Plain-English Licensing Breakdown

This is a license opportunity for a therapeutic asset or drug-enabling technology in Ophthalmology. In plain English, the buyer would be licensing science that could become a treatment program, usually after more validation. The current package appears to be preclinical and is associated with National Institutes of Health. The practical first use case is Ophthalmology. Public description: This CDC developed physiologic sampling pump (PSP) overcomes shortcomings of previous devices by the use of calibrated valves in conjunction with a constant speed pump. This novel approach obviates typical PSP inertia that inherently.

What is exciting

Already past pure discovery: Preclinical validation gives a buyer something concrete to reproduce, optimize, or package into an IND-enabling plan.

Oncology remains highly partnerable: Pharma buyers still pay attention when an asset can be tied to biomarkers, combinations, resistance biology, or a defined tumor segment.

The eye can create faster proof: Local delivery, imaging endpoints, and smaller patient groups can make ophthalmology assets easier to de-risk than broad systemic programs.

Can sell into pharma before reimbursement: A biomarker or AI tool can create value as trial enrichment, patient stratification, or translational support before becoming a regulated diagnostic.

Negatives / diligence concerns

Translation still unproven: Animal or lab data may not predict human performance; tox, PK/PD, CMC, and indication selection still need diligence.

Validation can be harder than the demo: Models and biomarkers need locked datasets, external validation, clinical utility, data rights, and a regulatory/reimbursement plan.

Competitive field may be crowded: Oncology buyers will ask why this is better than existing modalities, combinations, and biomarker strategies already in the clinic.

Risk Flags

  • Human validation and clinical path require diligence.
  • Patent scope and remaining exclusivity need review with counsel.
  • Inventor readiness and licensing terms are not yet verified.

Strategic Pharma Attractiveness

Large pharma would care if this becomes more than an interesting university-originated technology: it needs a crisp Ophthalmology wedge, a measurable value inflection, and a diligence package that makes the first deal feel like an option on upside rather than a blind research bet.

Most logical pharma targets Merck — Checkpoint-franchise adjacency and combination-trial appetite. AstraZeneca — Oncology breadth plus interest in biomarker-defined populations. Roche / Genentech — Diagnostics plus oncology translational machinery.

Development Strategy to Increase PoS

First indication: Ophthalmology

Study design: Retrospective locked-dataset validation followed by one prospective pharma enrichment pilot.

Key experiments Validate the AI-optimized pivot: Reframe as a localized orphan-retina or front-of-eye precision program Run independent replication of the core claim with pre-specified success criteria Generate a partner-facing risk register that separates solved, testable, and unresolved risks

Final Recommendation

Proceed: Worth a short exclusive option if diligence confirms IP scope and inventor data quality. The most investable version is: Reframe as a localized orphan-retina or front-of-eye precision program

Best next experiment: Run the smallest independent study that validates: Switch from systemic exposure to intravitreal, topical, or depot delivery and use OCT/ERG/imaging biomarkers as early go/no-go endpoints.

Best licensing timing: Begin BD conversations after the next validation package; pursue a license, option, or asset sale once the first value inflection is visible.